Telehealth Accessibility Testing Case Study
Telehealth platform connecting patients with licensed providers online.
Industry — Healthcare
Healthcare software can't afford leaked patient data or broken records — we test with PHI-safe practices so your releases protect patients and data.
Testing with real patient data creates risk. We work with synthetic or de-identified data by default.
We check that records move between systems completely and correctly.
Patients with disabilities must be able to book, read results and pay. We audit against WCAG 2.2 and Section 508.
We plan test data and environment access before testing starts. Synthetic or de-identified data is the default, and access follows least-privilege rules agreed with your team.
Security Testing Services →We test the messages and API calls that move clinical data between your product and other systems. We check that data arrives complete, correctly mapped and handled safely when something fails.
API Testing Services →We audit patient portals and apps with automated scans and manual screen-reader testing. You get a prioritised list of issues mapped to WCAG 2.2 criteria.
Accessibility Testing Services →Daily overlap with US and EU working hours
No, not by default. We test with synthetic or de-identified data. If your situation requires anything else, we agree the controls with your team in writing before testing starts.
We send and receive test messages and FHIR API calls in a test environment, then check that every field maps correctly and that failed or delayed messages are handled safely.
Yes. We combine automated scans with manual keyboard and screen-reader testing, and report each issue against the relevant WCAG 2.2 criterion with a suggested fix.
We sign an NDA before access, request only the permissions needed, use named accounts you can audit, and remove access when the engagement ends.